Pranav Gopal Week 15 - Quantum Amnesia



Brent Kavanaugh // Unsplash

A couple days ago I found an iceberg chart of some interesting theories and thought experiments, starting from some more popular concepts like Roko's Basilisk to what incited my blog post this week, quantum immortality. As most things with "quantum" proceeding it tend to be, I didn't really understand much of it, but I reread the Wikipedia page a couple times and understood I was way out of my depth, and that my lack of brain power outweighed my curiosity.

However, while looking into some related topics, I found my discussion point for this weeks post: Quantum Amnesia. Unlike quantum immortality, this idea seems to have stemmed from a singular study in 2008 by Lorenzo Maccone, and is a lot easier and simpler to follow. 

The basis of this topic is the concept of an "arrow of time," or the idea that time is asymmetrical and flows in a one way direction. The "issue" in this is that the laws of physics and thermodynamics are all symmetrical and can occur regardless of time going forwards or backwards. However, everyday occurrences don't typically occur both forwards and backwards. So for example, food warmed up in the microwave will cool down when placed outside, but nobody ever sees food on a plate suddenly heat up. These phenomena are backed up by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which indicates that the entropy of a closed system never decreases. Thus, systems will gradually increase in entropy, as heat dissipates into the surroundings and other energy transfers and processes occur. These processes, theoretically, should be the same regardless of time proceeding forwards or back, so why exactly don't we see spontaneous reactions like a cold cup warming up? 

Maccone hypothesizes that these reactions occur forward and backwards regularly, providing a very unique reason as to why nobody seems to see these "backwards" reactions. Maccone, in his paper, asserts that people who witness these events have their memories erased out of necessity, since time flows only asymmetrically. He justifies this by indicating that when a system is observed, the observer and the system enter a the state of quantum entanglement, where both cannot be described without the inclusion of the other. As a result, the observer's memory of the events are erased, such that the two are no longer entangled. 

While this theory may provide a "solution" for the asymmetrical nature of the arrow of time, Maccone's theory cannot really be proved since he can't concretely indicate that entropy-decreasing phenomena actually occur. Considering the erasure of memories, Huw Price, another quantum physicist, argues that it isn't feasible for everyone to have the same orientation of time towards the future and past. As a result, nothing really is explained or solved by adopting this very improvable theory. 

This asymmetrical nature of the arrow of time still persists, despite this very unique approach to solving it. Personally, it just appears like the creation of a new mystery rather than a solution to the old. However, it would be interesting to consider that my memories are being erased on a regular basis, though it does raise quite a lot of questions. 

Comments

  1. Hi Pranav, your blog was very interesting, even though I still do not fully understand the idea behind this theory of time going backwards. It would be really surprising if time was actually going backwards and in reality our memories were being erased, however, that idea does not make much sense to me yet. It would definitely be a huge discovery if someone was able to prove that this actually happens, although I see the difficulty with trying to prove something that everyone supposedly forgets. In any case, I was really intrigued to learn about this “arrow of time” and to really consider the possibility of time going backward. Thanks for educating me about this theory and reminding me that there are still many unanswered questions about the world that surrounds us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pranav, your blog is something highly interesting. While I can barely follow the science that leads up to your conclusion that time must be flowing symmetrically, you had me absolutely lost when you started to describe the science and math behind how it could be possible for time to be moving in two directions. I suppose it is possible, with memories being lost at regular intervals to make space, but it just seems so unlikely that such a thing is possible. I cannot understand the science, but I am sure that it will make a great deal of sense in the future. Thank you for this wonderous idea!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Pranav, I admit when you said you found this idea to be easier than the other idea of "quantum immortality," I thought I would have no trouble understanding this idea. Unfortunately, I'm not the biggest science person, so I can't even imagine how hard the quantum immortality is to understand. Anyways, I do think I get the general idea of what you are talking about, but I simply can't comprehend time going backwards or forwards, or having any kind of direction at all. It's definitely intriguing and has given me something new to think about, so I thank you for that. I look forward to reading your next post!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tanvi Vidyala, Week #9: Language, A Powerful Tool in Human Cognition

Tanvi Vidyala, Week 11: The Power of Nostalgia

Tanvi Vidyala, Week 16: Keeping Track of Memories